Working for my RFE votes - shaking hands, kissing babies

[Potkay, Peter M (CTO Architecture + Engineering)]

I put together the below list for my colleagues at work - figured might as well send it here too.


Below is a list of Request for Enhancements I have opened with IBM in 2013. The link below each one will take you directly to the page where you can read the details of the request, look at any comment, and if you think it's a good idea, cast your vote. You will need an IBM ID to comment or vote.

If you think any are bad ideas, you can't negative-vote, but go ahead and comment on the page with your justification and alternate solution if any.


* "Allow a dedicated User Agent for the Command Line Interface via ssh"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=43263

* "Allow MQ Administrator to browse a get inhibited queue"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=42656

* "Have the Queue Manager produce a read only message showing all the parameters its running with"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=42528

* "Allow your existing secure channel connection in MBX to view Accounting and Statistics data"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=41900

* "Update dmpmqcfg to capture authority records for profiles for names of queues that don't exist yet"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=41015

* "MQINQ against clustered Queue Managers - allow proper functionality with only +inq authority"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=40878

* "Allow MQ Clustering to load balance at the queue level"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=39902

* "Increased granularity for MQ Event Message Delivery"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=39722

* "Enhance WMB Toolkit so it doesn't cause the Queue Manager to throw unnecessary MQ Authority Events"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=38289

* "Have the WMB Broker record in its log the User ID that initiated the change"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=36857

* "MQ stats for PUTs on Remote Queues"
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=31297
I can't believe they rejected this last one. Its such a basic requirement I think. If you can't vote for it because its Rejected/Closed, please add a comment saying you would like this to be implemented if you agree on the idea.





Peter Potkay




************************************************************
This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and destroy all copies.
************************************************************

To unsubscribe, write to LISTSERV-0lvw86wZMd9k/bWDasg6f+***@public.gmane.org and,
in the message body (not the subject), write: SIGNOFF MQSERIES
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://listserv.meduniwien.ac.at/archives/mqser-l.html